Policy Notes

Split Viewer

Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17(35): 1498-1515

Published online July 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.35.3

© The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

Study to Establish a National Dose Management System for Dental Imaging Examinations

Ji Yun Lee1, Jung Su Kim2, Sang Wook Yoon3, You Jeong Min4, Jong Won Gil4, Jong Hun Won4, Chena Lee1*

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea, 2Department of Radiological Technology, Daegu Health University, Daegu, Korea, 3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea, 4Division of Medical Radiation and Health Management, Department of Health Hazard Response, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea

*Corresponding author: Chena Lee, Tel: +82-2-2228-3124, E-mail: chenalee@yuhs.ac

Received: July 2, 2024; Revised: July 22, 2024; Accepted: July 23, 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

With the rapid advancements in x-ray technology in the medical field, the use of diagnostic radiation has been increasing. Consequently, concerns about radiation exposure have been increasing since its introduction. In dentistry, radiation exposure during imaging examinations is relatively low, and a high frequency of these procedures, particularly the extensive use of dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has amplified concerns among users and the general public. This highlights the need for a dose management system tailored to dental x-ray equipment. This study aimed to establish such a system nationwide for dental imaging. Therefore, the structures of the intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography and CBCT systems were analyzed, and a comprehensive data collection plan was formulated. Using this groundwork, the national dose management system was created and tested through a pilot operation. To continue expanding and improving the system, feedback from experts in the field should be incorporated.

Key words Dentistry; Intraoral radiography; Panoramic radiography; Cone-beam computed tomography; National dose management System

Key messages

① What is known previously?

Radiation exposure in dentistry affects a large population across all ages, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contributing significantly. Efforts to reduce medical radiation include research on radiological exam appropriateness and the introduction of diagnostic reference levels.

② What new information is presented?

By 2023, 44,985 dental vices were available in the Republic of Korea. All dental radiology equipment must output dose-area-product (DAP) values; however, only approximately 27% of the CBCT equipment output DAP values.

③ What are implications?

The national dose management system in dentistry provides foundational data for establishing diagnostic reference levels. Continuous dose management requires active efforts from users, manufacturers, and the government to ensure that dental equipment meets imaging standards.

Radiography is essential for precise diagnosis and treatment. However, given the inherent risk of radiation exposure, medical radiography should be conducted with utmost care to minimize radiation levels while preserving patient benefits. To address this, global initiatives have centered on analyzing and implementing the national diagnostic reference level (DRL). DRL represents the third and fourth-quartile values derived from a comprehensive national survey of radiation levels utilized in hospitals for specific examinations. The dose-area-product (DAP; unit: mGy∙cm2) serves as the dose metric.

The primary objective of DRL is to empower healthcare providers to optimize radiography procedures and consequently reduce overall medical radiation exposure at a national level. By comparing their dose levels to DRL, medical institutions can evaluate the effectiveness of radiation protection measures and image quality. This enables them to refine radiography protocol accordingly.

In the field of dentistry, the utilization of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has proliferated since its introduction in the 1990s. Correspondingly, concerns and interest regarding dental radiation have intensified. According to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), CBCT availability has increased by approximately 53% over the past 5 years, with more than half of dental hospitals and clinics currently employing CBCT (Figure 1) [1,2].

Figure 1. The current state of radiographic equipment in the dental field in the Republic of Korea
(A) Number of dental radiology equipment installations (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [1]). (B) Status of introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) equipment in the Republic of Korea (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [2]).

Conventional dental radiography, while frequently administered to patients of all ages, involves relatively low radiation doses. Conversely, CBCT utilizes significantly higher radiation levels [3]. Similar to other dental examinations, CBCT scans are utilized regularly for treatment, diagnosis, and surgical planning [4]. Consequently, the widespread adoption of CBCT is considered a primary factor in the increasing exposure to dental radiation. As CBCT use has grown and public awareness of radiation risks has heightened, effective patient education and radiation management have become crucial in dentistry. While many dental providers express concerns about CBCT radiation exposure, precise radiation levels from their equipment are often uncertain. Therefore, optimizing radiography through regular analysis and the establishment of DRLs is essential in dental practice.

Several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Republic of Korea (ROK), have implemented DRLs for dental radiography (Table 1) [5-8]. ROK initiated a five-year DRL cycle in 2004 to reduce radiation exposure; however, compared to European nations with stricter radiation protection regulations, significant opportunities remain for dose reduction in Korean dental radiography. Establishing DRLs requires considering the geographical distribution of dental clinics, with on-site visits to selected dental hospitals for data collection. In ROK, CBCT DRLs are currently based on maxillary implant procedures [5], while other countries often rely on on-site or questionnaire surveys. To enhance DRL reliability, a broader inclusion of dental clinics and a comprehensive examination of various protocols is necessary, although practical limitations exist.

Table 1. Comparison of national diagnostic reference levels by country
Type of examinationKorea (2019) [5]United States (2019) [6]United Kingdom (2019) [7]Japen (2020) [8]
Panoramic radiographyAdult22712381134
Child163–1756760-
CBCTAdult2,0607272651,960
Child1,208624169-

Unit: mGyㆍcm2. CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography.



The American College of Radiology operates the Dose Index Registry to optimize radiation doses for multi-slice CT examinations. Directly linked to testing equipment or compatible with dose management programs, the registry calculates DRLs for CT, enabling institutions to compare their dose levels to national or regional benchmarks [9]. This overcomes challenges associated with large-scale on-site surveys.

A growing awareness of automated dose collection systems has led to recent instances of monitoring radiation exposure through CBCT equipment linked with commercial dose programs [10]. Notably, ROK’s CBCT equipment now surpasses the number of installed multi-slice CT units [11], necessitating robust national dose management. Implementing an automated system for dose information management would facilitate the accurate collection and management of large-scale dose data. This policy study aims to adapt the existing CT system for dentistry and introduce a national dose management system for dental radiography.

1. Status of Dental Radiation Equipment Installed in the Republic of Korea

A 2023 investigation based on Korean Statistical Information Service data assessed dental equipment status across ROK. Of the 44,985 identified operational equipments, approximately 38% (n=17,519) were CBCT units, while panoramic radiography accounted for approximately 9% (n=4,179). The lower number of panoramic systems reflects the increasing prevalence of combined panoramic and CBCT units, categorized as CBCT equipment. Notably, less than approximately 27% of CBCT units provided dose information in DAP format.

Medical images are standardized in digital image and communications in medicine (DICOM) format, encompassing image data, patient information, equipment details, examination date, institution, and radiation exposure conditions. While the DICOM standard mandates DAP output for all dental radiography equipment, ROK’s adoption of DAP-capable models is relatively recent.

2. Characterization by Radiography Equipment and Examination Site and Code Design

To establish a national dose management system for dental radiography, we analyzed the characteristics of individual radiographic equipment to create a system accommodating diverse equipment types [12]. Unlike panoramic and CBCT units, intraoral radiography often involves independent radiation generators and image receptors. Thus, a system capable of handling such configurations was essential. We focused on developing a comprehensive data accumulation method to capture dose data from individual equipment within each hospital.

To characterize examinations, we aligned the examination prescription information system with HIRA codes. We analyzed the relationship between exposure dose and individual codes within each equipment type. While some order codes differentiated exposure levels (e.g., temporomandibular joint and maxillary sinus panoramic radiography), HIRA codes and doses for intraoral radiography and CBCT were largely unrelated. CBCT, a dose contributor, was primarily differentiated by three-dimensional volume reconstruction codes. Consequently, a new coding system was necessary.

Given the minimal radiation exposure variations among individual teeth and the potential increase in system complexity, intraoral radiography was classified based on imaging technique (periapical and bite-wing) rather than dental formula. For CBCT, a new code system was devised with a primary emphasis on field-of-view and examination sites, as these factors significantly influenced dose. The proposed five-digit code structure encompassed the type of examination (first digit), major (second digit) and subcategory (third digit) of prescription, arbitrary serial number (fourth digit), and age (fifth digit) (Table 2).

Table 2. A coding system for dental radiology doses by examination type and prescription
FirstSecondThirdFourthFifth
Type of examinationPrescription name large classificationPrescription name minor classificationSerial numberAge group
IIntraoral radiography1Bitewing0-Random serialA
C
Adult
Child
2Periapical view
3Tube-shift
4Occlusal
PPanoramic radiography1General mode0-
2Special mode
CCBCT1Large (~15×15 cm)1Facial, TMJ
2Maxilla
2Medium (~10×10 cm)3Mandible
4Panoramic, jaw
3Small (~5×5 cm)5Implant
6Tooth, endo

CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; TMJ=temporomandibular joint.



3. System Design

According to the DICOM standard, dental radiographs, encompassing intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT image files, must be capable of generating a radiation dose structured report (RDSR) (Figure 2) [13]. While CBCT, a relatively recent technology, initially lacked RDSR output capabilities, the implementation of stricter regulations in 2011 mandated that CBCT equipment manufactured thereafter include dose value (DAP) in the DICOM header.

Figure 2. Analyze cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) structure documentation in digital image and communications in medicine radiation dose structuring reports (RDSR)
Reused from Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine [13].

To accommodate these equipment variations, the system design incorporated a dual-path approach. DICOM files were simultaneously transmitted to both the image viewer system and the dose management system agent upon image acquisition. In instances where dual-path output was infeasible the image viewer system (picture archiving and communication system) served as the intermediary for file transmission to the agent (Figure 3). This system architecture was informed by a previously developed dental radiography dose analysis system in the ROK [12].

Figure 3. A schematic of a dose management system design
CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; PACS=picture archiving and communication system; DAP=dose-area-product.

The dose management system extracted only dose values from the agent, transmitting fully anonymized data to the server. Subsequent analysis of this data enabled the circulation of DRLs for each defined examination code. The system was configured to deliver comparative tables, graphs, and relevant DRLs to individual medical institutions, empowering them to independently optimize dose levels.

Radiation has been a cornerstone of medical treatment for an extended period, with its significance and application steadily expanding. Advanced nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan have been proactive in radiation reduction, implementing DRLs based on comprehensive national surveys of high-radiation CT examinations. In ROK, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency has spearheaded multifaceted initiatives to reduce medical radiation, including a radiation dose management system and research on radiological examination appropriateness.

Historically, dental radiography, despite its widespread use across diverse populations, has received less stringent regulatory attention due to relatively low radiation doses. However, the advent of CBCT in the 1990s and its subsequent proliferation have led to a substantial increase in dental radiation exposure, necessitating focused attention. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive radiation dose management system capable of integrating various dental equipment, enabling real-time surveillance of dental hospitals and clinics, and facilitating the regular generation of accurate DRLs.

The proposed system was designed to collect dose data from equipment compliant with DICOM standard. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of dental equipment, varying by manufacturer and model, deviates from DICOM standards, hindering full system implementation. Collaborative efforts involving hospital administrators, manufacturers, and government agencies are essential to address these limitations and promote system upgrades and expansion.

Given the ubiquitous use of radiation equipment, even at the clinic level, prudent management is essential in dentistry. The prevalence of non-digital equipment in many facilities further complicates matters, as dose information is often unavailable at the equipment level. CBCT, in particular, demands stringent management due to its higher radiation exposure than conventional dental radiography. Despite this, the fact that 73% of CBCT equipment does not output dose information is a critical issue. Considering the predominance of domestically manufactured equipment in Korean dental clinics, targeted efforts to align domestic production with international standards and specifications can significantly improve the situation.

A systematic approach to upgrading dental equipment radiation dose management is necessary, including stricter inspections for radiation dose labeling during equipment licensing, installation, and examinations. While progress has been made with the 2011 mandate for radiation dose information on x-ray control panels by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, and subsequent DAP output in CBCT DICOM information, challenges persist in managing radiation exposure for intraoral and panoramic radiography. The separate combination of detectors and x-ray tubes in intraoral radiography often precludes DICOM information generation. Although intraoral radiography involves relatively low radiation doses, its widespread use, especially in pediatric and general populations, necessitates careful dose management. Continuous education and promotion of DICOM specifications related to dose information are crucial.

Effective implementation of a national dental radiography dose management system requires input from various stakeholders. Ongoing system upgrades and expansion can be facilitated through collaborative efforts. Additionally, individual facilities can contribute to dose reduction through in-house quality control measures. Government support, including the provision of DRLs, is essential for assisting hospitals in effective dose management. Institutional incentives such as rewards and certification programs can encourage voluntary participation among dental hospitals and clinics, fostering a culture of radiation safety. Ultimately, widespread engagement from dentists, radiologists, and dental hygienists is crucial for enhancing awareness and driving system improvement. Through concerted efforts from all stakeholders and sustained government support, significant progress can be made in reducing dental radiation exposure.

The developed national dose management system comprehensively integrates all dental equipment, including multi-devices, intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT, serving as a foundational platform for establishing dental radiography DRLs. Ongoing system upgrades, promotion, and expansion are anticipated to yield more precise DRLs based on actual patient radiation exposure. DRLs empower users to independently optimize radiation practices while informing national medical radiation management policies. To sustain this system, collaborative efforts among users, manufacturers, and the government are essential to ensure dental medical equipment adherence to medical imaging standards.

Ethics Statement: Not applicable.

Funding Source: This work was supported by the Research Program funded by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2023-10-007).

Acknowledgments: None.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization: JHW, JWG, YJM. Data curation: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY. Formal analysis: JYL, JSK. Funding acquisition: YJM. Investigation: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY. Methodology: JSK, JWG. Project administration: CNL, JSK, SWY. Resources: JSK. Software: JSK. Supervision: CNL, JSK, SWY. Validation: JHW, JWG, YJM. Visualization: JYL, CNL. Writing – original draft: JYL, CNL. Writing – review & editing: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY, JHW, JWG, YJM.

  1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2023) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30].
    Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  2. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2018~ 2021) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30].
    Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  3. Deman P, Atwal P, Duzenli C, Thakur Y, Ford NL, assignee. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:3201-22.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, assignee. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology - evidence-based guidelines. Publications Office; 2012.
  5. Min YJ, Park KJ, Yang SJ, et al, assignee. Diagnostic Reference Level Guidelines Dental Imaging (intraoral, panoramic, CBCT) [Internet]. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 8].
    Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20305050000&bid=0003
  6. U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), assignee. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) [Internet]. FDA; 2018 [cited 2024 Apr 8].
    Available from: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/radiation-safety/nationwide-evaluation-x-ray-trends-next
  7. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), assignee. National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) from 13 October 2022 [Internet]. UKHSA; 2022 [cited 2024 Apr 8].
    Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/ndrl
  8. Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure (J-RIME), assignee. National Diagnostic Reference Levels in Japan [Internet]. J-RIME; 2020 [cited 2024 Apr 8].
    Available from: https://j-rime.qst.go.jp/report/DRL2020_Engver.pdf
  9. Kim JS, Kwon SM, Cho PK, et al, assignee. Policy planning for patient dose registry system for computed tomography examination. Public Health Weekly Report 2022;15:1057-68.
  10. Brasil DM, Merken K, Binst J, Bosmans H, Haiter-Neto F, Jacobs R, assignee. Monitoring cone-beam CT radiation dose levels in a University Hospital. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2023;52:20220213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2021) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30].
    Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  12. Lee C, Lee SS, Kim JE, et al, assignee. A dose monitoring system for dental radiography. Imaging Sci Dent 2016;46:103-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM), assignee. Supplement 214; Cone Beam CT RDSR [Internet]. DICOM; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 10].
    Available from: https://www.dicomstandard.org/news-dir/progress/docs/sups/sup214-slides.pdf

Policy Notes

Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17(35): 1498-1515

Published online September 5, 2024 https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.35.3

Copyright © The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Study to Establish a National Dose Management System for Dental Imaging Examinations

Ji Yun Lee1, Jung Su Kim2, Sang Wook Yoon3, You Jeong Min4, Jong Won Gil4, Jong Hun Won4, Chena Lee1*

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea, 2Department of Radiological Technology, Daegu Health University, Daegu, Korea, 3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea, 4Division of Medical Radiation and Health Management, Department of Health Hazard Response, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence to:*Corresponding author: Chena Lee, Tel: +82-2-2228-3124, E-mail: chenalee@yuhs.ac

Received: July 2, 2024; Revised: July 22, 2024; Accepted: July 23, 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

With the rapid advancements in x-ray technology in the medical field, the use of diagnostic radiation has been increasing. Consequently, concerns about radiation exposure have been increasing since its introduction. In dentistry, radiation exposure during imaging examinations is relatively low, and a high frequency of these procedures, particularly the extensive use of dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has amplified concerns among users and the general public. This highlights the need for a dose management system tailored to dental x-ray equipment. This study aimed to establish such a system nationwide for dental imaging. Therefore, the structures of the intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography and CBCT systems were analyzed, and a comprehensive data collection plan was formulated. Using this groundwork, the national dose management system was created and tested through a pilot operation. To continue expanding and improving the system, feedback from experts in the field should be incorporated.

Keywords: Dentistry, Intraoral radiography, Panoramic radiography, Cone-beam computed tomography, National dose management System

Body

Key messages

① What is known previously?

Radiation exposure in dentistry affects a large population across all ages, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) contributing significantly. Efforts to reduce medical radiation include research on radiological exam appropriateness and the introduction of diagnostic reference levels.

② What new information is presented?

By 2023, 44,985 dental vices were available in the Republic of Korea. All dental radiology equipment must output dose-area-product (DAP) values; however, only approximately 27% of the CBCT equipment output DAP values.

③ What are implications?

The national dose management system in dentistry provides foundational data for establishing diagnostic reference levels. Continuous dose management requires active efforts from users, manufacturers, and the government to ensure that dental equipment meets imaging standards.

Introduction

Radiography is essential for precise diagnosis and treatment. However, given the inherent risk of radiation exposure, medical radiography should be conducted with utmost care to minimize radiation levels while preserving patient benefits. To address this, global initiatives have centered on analyzing and implementing the national diagnostic reference level (DRL). DRL represents the third and fourth-quartile values derived from a comprehensive national survey of radiation levels utilized in hospitals for specific examinations. The dose-area-product (DAP; unit: mGy∙cm2) serves as the dose metric.

The primary objective of DRL is to empower healthcare providers to optimize radiography procedures and consequently reduce overall medical radiation exposure at a national level. By comparing their dose levels to DRL, medical institutions can evaluate the effectiveness of radiation protection measures and image quality. This enables them to refine radiography protocol accordingly.

In the field of dentistry, the utilization of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has proliferated since its introduction in the 1990s. Correspondingly, concerns and interest regarding dental radiation have intensified. According to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), CBCT availability has increased by approximately 53% over the past 5 years, with more than half of dental hospitals and clinics currently employing CBCT (Figure 1) [1,2].

Figure 1. The current state of radiographic equipment in the dental field in the Republic of Korea
(A) Number of dental radiology equipment installations (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [1]). (B) Status of introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) equipment in the Republic of Korea (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [2]).

Conventional dental radiography, while frequently administered to patients of all ages, involves relatively low radiation doses. Conversely, CBCT utilizes significantly higher radiation levels [3]. Similar to other dental examinations, CBCT scans are utilized regularly for treatment, diagnosis, and surgical planning [4]. Consequently, the widespread adoption of CBCT is considered a primary factor in the increasing exposure to dental radiation. As CBCT use has grown and public awareness of radiation risks has heightened, effective patient education and radiation management have become crucial in dentistry. While many dental providers express concerns about CBCT radiation exposure, precise radiation levels from their equipment are often uncertain. Therefore, optimizing radiography through regular analysis and the establishment of DRLs is essential in dental practice.

Several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Republic of Korea (ROK), have implemented DRLs for dental radiography (Table 1) [5,,-8]. ROK initiated a five-year DRL cycle in 2004 to reduce radiation exposure; however, compared to European nations with stricter radiation protection regulations, significant opportunities remain for dose reduction in Korean dental radiography. Establishing DRLs requires considering the geographical distribution of dental clinics, with on-site visits to selected dental hospitals for data collection. In ROK, CBCT DRLs are currently based on maxillary implant procedures [5], while other countries often rely on on-site or questionnaire surveys. To enhance DRL reliability, a broader inclusion of dental clinics and a comprehensive examination of various protocols is necessary, although practical limitations exist.

Comparison of national diagnostic reference levels by country
Type of examinationKorea (2019) [5]United States (2019) [6]United Kingdom (2019) [7]Japen (2020) [8]
Panoramic radiographyAdult22712381134
Child163–1756760-
CBCTAdult2,0607272651,960
Child1,208624169-

Unit: mGyㆍcm2. CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography..



The American College of Radiology operates the Dose Index Registry to optimize radiation doses for multi-slice CT examinations. Directly linked to testing equipment or compatible with dose management programs, the registry calculates DRLs for CT, enabling institutions to compare their dose levels to national or regional benchmarks [9]. This overcomes challenges associated with large-scale on-site surveys.

A growing awareness of automated dose collection systems has led to recent instances of monitoring radiation exposure through CBCT equipment linked with commercial dose programs [10]. Notably, ROK’s CBCT equipment now surpasses the number of installed multi-slice CT units [11], necessitating robust national dose management. Implementing an automated system for dose information management would facilitate the accurate collection and management of large-scale dose data. This policy study aims to adapt the existing CT system for dentistry and introduce a national dose management system for dental radiography.

Methods

1. Status of Dental Radiation Equipment Installed in the Republic of Korea

A 2023 investigation based on Korean Statistical Information Service data assessed dental equipment status across ROK. Of the 44,985 identified operational equipments, approximately 38% (n=17,519) were CBCT units, while panoramic radiography accounted for approximately 9% (n=4,179). The lower number of panoramic systems reflects the increasing prevalence of combined panoramic and CBCT units, categorized as CBCT equipment. Notably, less than approximately 27% of CBCT units provided dose information in DAP format.

Medical images are standardized in digital image and communications in medicine (DICOM) format, encompassing image data, patient information, equipment details, examination date, institution, and radiation exposure conditions. While the DICOM standard mandates DAP output for all dental radiography equipment, ROK’s adoption of DAP-capable models is relatively recent.

2. Characterization by Radiography Equipment and Examination Site and Code Design

To establish a national dose management system for dental radiography, we analyzed the characteristics of individual radiographic equipment to create a system accommodating diverse equipment types [12]. Unlike panoramic and CBCT units, intraoral radiography often involves independent radiation generators and image receptors. Thus, a system capable of handling such configurations was essential. We focused on developing a comprehensive data accumulation method to capture dose data from individual equipment within each hospital.

To characterize examinations, we aligned the examination prescription information system with HIRA codes. We analyzed the relationship between exposure dose and individual codes within each equipment type. While some order codes differentiated exposure levels (e.g., temporomandibular joint and maxillary sinus panoramic radiography), HIRA codes and doses for intraoral radiography and CBCT were largely unrelated. CBCT, a dose contributor, was primarily differentiated by three-dimensional volume reconstruction codes. Consequently, a new coding system was necessary.

Given the minimal radiation exposure variations among individual teeth and the potential increase in system complexity, intraoral radiography was classified based on imaging technique (periapical and bite-wing) rather than dental formula. For CBCT, a new code system was devised with a primary emphasis on field-of-view and examination sites, as these factors significantly influenced dose. The proposed five-digit code structure encompassed the type of examination (first digit), major (second digit) and subcategory (third digit) of prescription, arbitrary serial number (fourth digit), and age (fifth digit) (Table 2).

A coding system for dental radiology doses by examination type and prescription
FirstSecondThirdFourthFifth
Type of examinationPrescription name large classificationPrescription name minor classificationSerial numberAge group
IIntraoral radiography1Bitewing0-Random serialA
C
Adult
Child
2Periapical view
3Tube-shift
4Occlusal
PPanoramic radiography1General mode0-
2Special mode
CCBCT1Large (~15×15 cm)1Facial, TMJ
2Maxilla
2Medium (~10×10 cm)3Mandible
4Panoramic, jaw
3Small (~5×5 cm)5Implant
6Tooth, endo

CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; TMJ=temporomandibular joint..



3. System Design

According to the DICOM standard, dental radiographs, encompassing intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT image files, must be capable of generating a radiation dose structured report (RDSR) (Figure 2) [13]. While CBCT, a relatively recent technology, initially lacked RDSR output capabilities, the implementation of stricter regulations in 2011 mandated that CBCT equipment manufactured thereafter include dose value (DAP) in the DICOM header.

Figure 2. Analyze cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) structure documentation in digital image and communications in medicine radiation dose structuring reports (RDSR)
Reused from Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine [13].

To accommodate these equipment variations, the system design incorporated a dual-path approach. DICOM files were simultaneously transmitted to both the image viewer system and the dose management system agent upon image acquisition. In instances where dual-path output was infeasible the image viewer system (picture archiving and communication system) served as the intermediary for file transmission to the agent (Figure 3). This system architecture was informed by a previously developed dental radiography dose analysis system in the ROK [12].

Figure 3. A schematic of a dose management system design
CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; PACS=picture archiving and communication system; DAP=dose-area-product.

The dose management system extracted only dose values from the agent, transmitting fully anonymized data to the server. Subsequent analysis of this data enabled the circulation of DRLs for each defined examination code. The system was configured to deliver comparative tables, graphs, and relevant DRLs to individual medical institutions, empowering them to independently optimize dose levels.

Results

Radiation has been a cornerstone of medical treatment for an extended period, with its significance and application steadily expanding. Advanced nations such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan have been proactive in radiation reduction, implementing DRLs based on comprehensive national surveys of high-radiation CT examinations. In ROK, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency has spearheaded multifaceted initiatives to reduce medical radiation, including a radiation dose management system and research on radiological examination appropriateness.

Historically, dental radiography, despite its widespread use across diverse populations, has received less stringent regulatory attention due to relatively low radiation doses. However, the advent of CBCT in the 1990s and its subsequent proliferation have led to a substantial increase in dental radiation exposure, necessitating focused attention. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive radiation dose management system capable of integrating various dental equipment, enabling real-time surveillance of dental hospitals and clinics, and facilitating the regular generation of accurate DRLs.

The proposed system was designed to collect dose data from equipment compliant with DICOM standard. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of dental equipment, varying by manufacturer and model, deviates from DICOM standards, hindering full system implementation. Collaborative efforts involving hospital administrators, manufacturers, and government agencies are essential to address these limitations and promote system upgrades and expansion.

Given the ubiquitous use of radiation equipment, even at the clinic level, prudent management is essential in dentistry. The prevalence of non-digital equipment in many facilities further complicates matters, as dose information is often unavailable at the equipment level. CBCT, in particular, demands stringent management due to its higher radiation exposure than conventional dental radiography. Despite this, the fact that 73% of CBCT equipment does not output dose information is a critical issue. Considering the predominance of domestically manufactured equipment in Korean dental clinics, targeted efforts to align domestic production with international standards and specifications can significantly improve the situation.

A systematic approach to upgrading dental equipment radiation dose management is necessary, including stricter inspections for radiation dose labeling during equipment licensing, installation, and examinations. While progress has been made with the 2011 mandate for radiation dose information on x-ray control panels by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, and subsequent DAP output in CBCT DICOM information, challenges persist in managing radiation exposure for intraoral and panoramic radiography. The separate combination of detectors and x-ray tubes in intraoral radiography often precludes DICOM information generation. Although intraoral radiography involves relatively low radiation doses, its widespread use, especially in pediatric and general populations, necessitates careful dose management. Continuous education and promotion of DICOM specifications related to dose information are crucial.

Effective implementation of a national dental radiography dose management system requires input from various stakeholders. Ongoing system upgrades and expansion can be facilitated through collaborative efforts. Additionally, individual facilities can contribute to dose reduction through in-house quality control measures. Government support, including the provision of DRLs, is essential for assisting hospitals in effective dose management. Institutional incentives such as rewards and certification programs can encourage voluntary participation among dental hospitals and clinics, fostering a culture of radiation safety. Ultimately, widespread engagement from dentists, radiologists, and dental hygienists is crucial for enhancing awareness and driving system improvement. Through concerted efforts from all stakeholders and sustained government support, significant progress can be made in reducing dental radiation exposure.

Discussion

The developed national dose management system comprehensively integrates all dental equipment, including multi-devices, intraoral radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT, serving as a foundational platform for establishing dental radiography DRLs. Ongoing system upgrades, promotion, and expansion are anticipated to yield more precise DRLs based on actual patient radiation exposure. DRLs empower users to independently optimize radiation practices while informing national medical radiation management policies. To sustain this system, collaborative efforts among users, manufacturers, and the government are essential to ensure dental medical equipment adherence to medical imaging standards.

Declarations

Ethics Statement: Not applicable.

Funding Source: This work was supported by the Research Program funded by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2023-10-007).

Acknowledgments: None.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization: JHW, JWG, YJM. Data curation: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY. Formal analysis: JYL, JSK. Funding acquisition: YJM. Investigation: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY. Methodology: JSK, JWG. Project administration: CNL, JSK, SWY. Resources: JSK. Software: JSK. Supervision: CNL, JSK, SWY. Validation: JHW, JWG, YJM. Visualization: JYL, CNL. Writing – original draft: JYL, CNL. Writing – review & editing: JYL, CNL, JSK, SWY, JHW, JWG, YJM.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.The current state of radiographic equipment in the dental field in the Republic of Korea
(A) Number of dental radiology equipment installations (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [1]). (B) Status of introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) equipment in the Republic of Korea (Reused from Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [2]).
Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17: 1498-1515https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.35.3

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Analyze cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) structure documentation in digital image and communications in medicine radiation dose structuring reports (RDSR)
Reused from Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine [13].
Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17: 1498-1515https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.35.3

Fig 3.

Figure 3.A schematic of a dose management system design
CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; PACS=picture archiving and communication system; DAP=dose-area-product.
Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17: 1498-1515https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.35.3
Comparison of national diagnostic reference levels by country
Type of examinationKorea (2019) [5]United States (2019) [6]United Kingdom (2019) [7]Japen (2020) [8]
Panoramic radiographyAdult22712381134
Child163–1756760-
CBCTAdult2,0607272651,960
Child1,208624169-

Unit: mGyㆍcm2. CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography..


A coding system for dental radiology doses by examination type and prescription
FirstSecondThirdFourthFifth
Type of examinationPrescription name large classificationPrescription name minor classificationSerial numberAge group
IIntraoral radiography1Bitewing0-Random serialA
C
Adult
Child
2Periapical view
3Tube-shift
4Occlusal
PPanoramic radiography1General mode0-
2Special mode
CCBCT1Large (~15×15 cm)1Facial, TMJ
2Maxilla
2Medium (~10×10 cm)3Mandible
4Panoramic, jaw
3Small (~5×5 cm)5Implant
6Tooth, endo

CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography; TMJ=temporomandibular joint..


References

  1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2023) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  2. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2018~ 2021) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  3. Deman P, Atwal P, Duzenli C, Thakur Y, Ford NL, assignee. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:3201-22.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, assignee. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology - evidence-based guidelines. Publications Office; 2012.
  5. Min YJ, Park KJ, Yang SJ, et al, assignee. Diagnostic Reference Level Guidelines Dental Imaging (intraoral, panoramic, CBCT) [Internet]. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20305050000&bid=0003
  6. U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), assignee. Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) [Internet]. FDA; 2018 [cited 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/radiation-safety/nationwide-evaluation-x-ray-trends-next
  7. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), assignee. National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) from 13 October 2022 [Internet]. UKHSA; 2022 [cited 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/ndrl
  8. Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure (J-RIME), assignee. National Diagnostic Reference Levels in Japan [Internet]. J-RIME; 2020 [cited 2024 Apr 8]. Available from: https://j-rime.qst.go.jp/report/DRL2020_Engver.pdf
  9. Kim JS, Kwon SM, Cho PK, et al, assignee. Policy planning for patient dose registry system for computed tomography examination. Public Health Weekly Report 2022;15:1057-68.
  10. Brasil DM, Merken K, Binst J, Bosmans H, Haiter-Neto F, Jacobs R, assignee. Monitoring cone-beam CT radiation dose levels in a University Hospital. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2023;52:20220213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), assignee. Medical equipment by type of care organization (2021) [Internet]. HIRA; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: https://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/selectOpenData.do?sno=11924&publDataTpCd=&searchCnd=&searchWrd=%EC%9E%A5%EB%B9%84&pageIndex=1
  12. Lee C, Lee SS, Kim JE, et al, assignee. A dose monitoring system for dental radiography. Imaging Sci Dent 2016;46:103-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM), assignee. Supplement 214; Cone Beam CT RDSR [Internet]. DICOM; 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.dicomstandard.org/news-dir/progress/docs/sups/sup214-slides.pdf

Share

  • line

Related articles

PHWR