Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(27): 1926-1933
Published online July 1, 2021
© The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency
Min Jinsoo1, Kim Ju Sang1, Park Jae Seuk2, Song Chieeun3, Jang Yoojin3, Kim Jaetae3, Kwon Yunhyung3, Kim Youmi3
1College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
2College of Medicine, Dankook University
3Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)
To manage tuberculosis (TB) patients treated by private medical institutions, the Korean government has been promoting a national Private-Public Mix (PPM) TB control project with the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases since 2011. This study analyzed the indicators for TB management reported by medical institutions participating in PPM TB control project from 2017 to 2019. The final treatment results were confirmed through observation for a total of five quarters by dividing the reported date by quarter.
As diagnositic tests and key indicators of the management rate of active TB patients, sputum smears (94.3%), culture tests (93.7%), and drug susceptibility tests (93.5%) were conducted. Major findings indicated that the compliance rate of initial standard treatment was high (93.6%). Further findings indicated that the treatment success rate for sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) positive patients was 84.9%; a decrease from 86.8% in 2018 to 84.7% in 2019.
Furthermore, the case investigation rate and contactor screening rate, which are indicators related to the early detection of active TB patients and TB prevention treatment, were high at approximately 98.4% and 90% (89.4% in adults and 91.8% in children) respectively. However, the rate of initiated latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment tended to be low at 53.8% in adults and 85.8% in children, requiring private and public cooperation to increase the rate of treatment for LTBI.
This study concluded that Korea's overall TB management indicators are improving, but some regions or institutions are still below the national average. To increase the success rate of TB treatment, measures to improve the target underachieving indicators through national PPM TB control project are required. In addition, improvements in TB management indicators will continue to be used as a basis for assessing the effectiveness of PPM control project.
Key words Tuberculosis (TB), Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), Private-public mix (PPM), TB control project, TB management indicators
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New TB notification cases (persons) | 32,181 | 30,892 | 28,161 | 26,433 | 23,821 | |
| New TB notification rate (person/100,000 population) | 63.2 | 60.4 | 55.0 | 51.5 | 46.4 | |
| PPM hospitals | New TB cases (person) | 21,128 | 20,531 | 19,349 | 18,698 | 18,624 |
| Percentage management (%) | 65.7 | 66.5 | 68.7 | 70.7 | 78.2 | |
| Number of hospitals | 127 | 128 | 127 | 127 | 161 | |
| Number of TB specialist nurses | 193 | 200 | 200 | 198 | 258 | |
(Unit: %)
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case investigation | Investigation performed rate | 98.7 | 98.5 | 98.1 | 98.4 |
| Period compliance rate | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | |
| Sputum AFB smear test | Rate of tests performed | 93.4 | 94.9 | 94.8 | 94.3 |
| Rate of positive results | 29.6 | 29.0 | 28.7 | 29.1 | |
| Sputum AFB culture test | Rate of tests performed | 92.2 | 94.6 | 94.4 | 93.7 |
| Rate of positive results | 60.1 | 60.8 | 60.3 | 60.4 | |
| Drug susceptibility test (DST) | Rate of total DST performed | 93.2 | 93.6 | 93.8 | 93.5 |
| Rate of conventional method DST performed | 91.9 | 92.7 | 93.2 | 92.6 | |
| Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | 93.7 | 93.6 | 93.6 | 93.6 |
| Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | 83.4 | 86.8 | 84.7 | 84.9 |
| Treatment discontinued/failed | Rate of treatment discontinuation | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| Rate of treatment failed | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
(Unit: %, n)
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Contacts investigation /Rate of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) /Rate of initiated LTBI treatment | Adult TB contacts | Contacts investigation rate | 87.0 | 89.5 | 91.9 | 89.4 |
| LTBI screening rate | 25.7 | 27.6 | 26.3 | 26.5 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 53.3 | 48.1 | 59.8 | 53.8 | ||
| Childhood TB contacts | Rate of Contacts investigation | 89.4 | 93.1 | 93.4 | 91.8 | |
| LTBI screening rate | 18.8 | 20.3 | 21.3 | 20.0 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 81.9 | 85.8 | 90.0 | 85.8 | ||
| Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients after contacts investigation | Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| Sputum smear test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 50.7 | 47.9 | 45.1 | 48.0 | |
| Rate of positive results | 5.5 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 | ||
| Sputum culture test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 42.2 | 42.2 | 41.3 | 41.9 | |
| Rate of positive results | 6.9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 7.7 | ||
| Final diagnosis of household Contact investigation program (n) | Normal | 11,271 | 12,938 | 14,434 | - | |
| Active TB | 104 | 88 | 94 | - | ||
| LTBI(Include inactive TB) | 4,282 | 4,570 | 4,492 | - | ||
| Other diseases | 285 | 388 | 429 | - | ||
| Not a contact | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
| No. of individuals in an average household | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | ||
Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(27): 1926-1933
Published online July 1, 2021
Copyright © The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.
Min Jinsoo1, Kim Ju Sang1, Park Jae Seuk2, Song Chieeun3, Jang Yoojin3, Kim Jaetae3, Kwon Yunhyung3, Kim Youmi3
1College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
2College of Medicine, Dankook University
3Division of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)
To manage tuberculosis (TB) patients treated by private medical institutions, the Korean government has been promoting a national Private-Public Mix (PPM) TB control project with the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases since 2011. This study analyzed the indicators for TB management reported by medical institutions participating in PPM TB control project from 2017 to 2019. The final treatment results were confirmed through observation for a total of five quarters by dividing the reported date by quarter.
As diagnositic tests and key indicators of the management rate of active TB patients, sputum smears (94.3%), culture tests (93.7%), and drug susceptibility tests (93.5%) were conducted. Major findings indicated that the compliance rate of initial standard treatment was high (93.6%). Further findings indicated that the treatment success rate for sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) positive patients was 84.9%; a decrease from 86.8% in 2018 to 84.7% in 2019.
Furthermore, the case investigation rate and contactor screening rate, which are indicators related to the early detection of active TB patients and TB prevention treatment, were high at approximately 98.4% and 90% (89.4% in adults and 91.8% in children) respectively. However, the rate of initiated latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment tended to be low at 53.8% in adults and 85.8% in children, requiring private and public cooperation to increase the rate of treatment for LTBI.
This study concluded that Korea's overall TB management indicators are improving, but some regions or institutions are still below the national average. To increase the success rate of TB treatment, measures to improve the target underachieving indicators through national PPM TB control project are required. In addition, improvements in TB management indicators will continue to be used as a basis for assessing the effectiveness of PPM control project.
Keywords: Tuberculosis (TB), Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), Private-public mix (PPM), TB control project, TB management indicators
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New TB notification cases (persons) | 32,181 | 30,892 | 28,161 | 26,433 | 23,821 | |
| New TB notification rate (person/100,000 population) | 63.2 | 60.4 | 55.0 | 51.5 | 46.4 | |
| PPM hospitals | New TB cases (person) | 21,128 | 20,531 | 19,349 | 18,698 | 18,624 |
| Percentage management (%) | 65.7 | 66.5 | 68.7 | 70.7 | 78.2 | |
| Number of hospitals | 127 | 128 | 127 | 127 | 161 | |
| Number of TB specialist nurses | 193 | 200 | 200 | 198 | 258 | |
(Unit: %).
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case investigation | Investigation performed rate | 98.7 | 98.5 | 98.1 | 98.4 |
| Period compliance rate | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | |
| Sputum AFB smear test | Rate of tests performed | 93.4 | 94.9 | 94.8 | 94.3 |
| Rate of positive results | 29.6 | 29.0 | 28.7 | 29.1 | |
| Sputum AFB culture test | Rate of tests performed | 92.2 | 94.6 | 94.4 | 93.7 |
| Rate of positive results | 60.1 | 60.8 | 60.3 | 60.4 | |
| Drug susceptibility test (DST) | Rate of total DST performed | 93.2 | 93.6 | 93.8 | 93.5 |
| Rate of conventional method DST performed | 91.9 | 92.7 | 93.2 | 92.6 | |
| Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | 93.7 | 93.6 | 93.6 | 93.6 |
| Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | 83.4 | 86.8 | 84.7 | 84.9 |
| Treatment discontinued/failed | Rate of treatment discontinuation | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| Rate of treatment failed | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
(Unit: %, n).
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Contacts investigation /Rate of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) /Rate of initiated LTBI treatment | Adult TB contacts | Contacts investigation rate | 87.0 | 89.5 | 91.9 | 89.4 |
| LTBI screening rate | 25.7 | 27.6 | 26.3 | 26.5 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 53.3 | 48.1 | 59.8 | 53.8 | ||
| Childhood TB contacts | Rate of Contacts investigation | 89.4 | 93.1 | 93.4 | 91.8 | |
| LTBI screening rate | 18.8 | 20.3 | 21.3 | 20.0 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 81.9 | 85.8 | 90.0 | 85.8 | ||
| Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients after contacts investigation | Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| Sputum smear test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 50.7 | 47.9 | 45.1 | 48.0 | |
| Rate of positive results | 5.5 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 | ||
| Sputum culture test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 42.2 | 42.2 | 41.3 | 41.9 | |
| Rate of positive results | 6.9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 7.7 | ||
| Final diagnosis of household Contact investigation program (n) | Normal | 11,271 | 12,938 | 14,434 | - | |
| Active TB | 104 | 88 | 94 | - | ||
| LTBI(Include inactive TB) | 4,282 | 4,570 | 4,492 | - | ||
| Other diseases | 285 | 388 | 429 | - | ||
| Not a contact | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
| No. of individuals in an average household | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | ||
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New TB notification cases (persons) | 32,181 | 30,892 | 28,161 | 26,433 | 23,821 | |
| New TB notification rate (person/100,000 population) | 63.2 | 60.4 | 55.0 | 51.5 | 46.4 | |
| PPM hospitals | New TB cases (person) | 21,128 | 20,531 | 19,349 | 18,698 | 18,624 |
| Percentage management (%) | 65.7 | 66.5 | 68.7 | 70.7 | 78.2 | |
| Number of hospitals | 127 | 128 | 127 | 127 | 161 | |
| Number of TB specialist nurses | 193 | 200 | 200 | 198 | 258 | |
(Unit: %).
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case investigation | Investigation performed rate | 98.7 | 98.5 | 98.1 | 98.4 |
| Period compliance rate | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 99.7 | |
| Sputum AFB smear test | Rate of tests performed | 93.4 | 94.9 | 94.8 | 94.3 |
| Rate of positive results | 29.6 | 29.0 | 28.7 | 29.1 | |
| Sputum AFB culture test | Rate of tests performed | 92.2 | 94.6 | 94.4 | 93.7 |
| Rate of positive results | 60.1 | 60.8 | 60.3 | 60.4 | |
| Drug susceptibility test (DST) | Rate of total DST performed | 93.2 | 93.6 | 93.8 | 93.5 |
| Rate of conventional method DST performed | 91.9 | 92.7 | 93.2 | 92.6 | |
| Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | Compliance rate of initial standard treatment regimen | 93.7 | 93.6 | 93.6 | 93.6 |
| Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | Treatment success rate among smear-positive TB patients | 83.4 | 86.8 | 84.7 | 84.9 |
| Treatment discontinued/failed | Rate of treatment discontinuation | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| Rate of treatment failed | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
(Unit: %, n).
| Variable | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Contacts investigation /Rate of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) /Rate of initiated LTBI treatment | Adult TB contacts | Contacts investigation rate | 87.0 | 89.5 | 91.9 | 89.4 |
| LTBI screening rate | 25.7 | 27.6 | 26.3 | 26.5 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 53.3 | 48.1 | 59.8 | 53.8 | ||
| Childhood TB contacts | Rate of Contacts investigation | 89.4 | 93.1 | 93.4 | 91.8 | |
| LTBI screening rate | 18.8 | 20.3 | 21.3 | 20.0 | ||
| Initiated LTBI treatment rate | 81.9 | 85.8 | 90.0 | 85.8 | ||
| Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients after contacts investigation | Proportion of suspected TB and TB patients | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| Sputum smear test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 50.7 | 47.9 | 45.1 | 48.0 | |
| Rate of positive results | 5.5 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 | ||
| Sputum culture test for suspected TB | Rate of tests performed | 42.2 | 42.2 | 41.3 | 41.9 | |
| Rate of positive results | 6.9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 7.7 | ||
| Final diagnosis of household Contact investigation program (n) | Normal | 11,271 | 12,938 | 14,434 | - | |
| Active TB | 104 | 88 | 94 | - | ||
| LTBI(Include inactive TB) | 4,282 | 4,570 | 4,492 | - | ||
| Other diseases | 285 | 388 | 429 | - | ||
| Not a contact | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | ||
| No. of individuals in an average household | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | ||
Park Yong-joon, Kim Youngman, Shin Ji-ae, Han Sunmi, Park Shin Young, Kim Jieun, Park Young Joon, Jung Sun-young, Choi Jae Chol
Public Health Weekly Report 2020; 13(18): 1231-1246 https://doi.org/10.56786/phwr.2020.13.18.1231Kim HeeAe, Shin JeeYeon, Kong Insik, On JinHee, Oh KeunYoung
Public Health Weekly Report 2020; 13(13): 737-755 https://doi.org/10.56786/phwr.2020.13.13.737Min Jinsoo, Lee Ki Man
Public Health Weekly Report 2020; 13(12): 669-673 https://doi.org/10.56786/phwr.2020.13.12.669