Original Articles

Split Viewer

Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(49): 3495-3501

Published online December 2, 2021

© The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

Stepwise stroke recognition through Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) : electronic health record-based observational cohort study

Sung Eun Lee1, Min Kim2, Ji Man Hong2, Seung Hee Lee3, Sang-Moon Yun3, Won-Ho Kim3

1Department of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
3Division of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Department of Chronic Disease Convergence Research, National Institute of Health (NIH), Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)

Stroke recognition systems have been developed to reduce time delays, however, a comprehensive triaging score identifying stroke subtypes is needed to guide appropriate management. This study aimed to develop a prehospital scoring system for rapid stroke recognition and identify stroke subtype simultaneously.
In the prospective database of the regional emergency and stroke center, the Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) of 1,599 patients suspected of acute stroke was analyzed from an automatically-stored electronic health record. Final confirmation was performed with neuroimaging. Using multiple regression analyses, this study determined independent predictors of tier 1 (true-stroke or not), tier 2 (hemorrhagic stroke or not), and tier 3 (emergent large vessel occlusion [ELVO] or not). The diagnostic performance of the stepwise CIVIL scoring system was investigated using internal validation. A new scoring system characterized by a stepwise clinical assessment was developed in three tiers.
Tier 1: Seven CIVIL-AS3A2P items (total score from –7 to +6) were deduced for true stroke as age (>60 years); stroke risks without seizure or psychiatric disease, extreme sugar; “any asymmetry”, “not ambulating”; abnormal blood pressure at a cut-off point +1 with diagnostic sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 56.4%. Tier 2: Four items for hemorrhagic stroke were identified as the CIVIL-MAPS indicating mental change, Age below 60 years, high blood Pressure, no Stroke risks with cut-point +2 (sensitivity 47.5%, specificity 85.4%). Tier 3: For ELVO diagnosis: we applied with CIVIL-GFAST items (Gaze, Face, Arm, Speech) with cut-point >3 (sensitivity 66.5%, specificity 79.8%) were applied.
The CIVIL score is a comprehensive and versatile system that recognizes strokes and identifies the stroke subtype simultaneously.

Key words Stroke, Stroke mimic, Hemorrhagic stroke, Ischemic stroke, Emergent large vessel occlusion

Table 1. Identifying of suspicious acute stroke patients in a stepwise fashion
TierCIVIL scoring system
1Stroke mimic vs true stroke
2Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke
3Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO


Table 2. Descriptive comparison of various early stroke recognition scales
Tier 1 : mimic vs strokeMimic preferredItems (CIVIL-AS3A2P)Stroke preferred

□ Clinical Infomation

■ Vital signs

■ Initial Labs

40 years (-1)Age≥ 60 years (+1)
No (-1)Stroke risk (cardiac)Yes (+1)
Yes (-1)Seizure or psychiatric historyNo (+1)
≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1)Sugar-
No (-1)AsymmetryYes (+1)
No (-1)not AmbulatingYes (+1)
≤ 90 mmHg (-1)Pressure (SBP)≥ 140 mmHg (+1)
Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagicIschemic preferredItems (CIVIL-MAPS)Hemorrhagic preferred

□ Clinical Infomation

■ Vital signs

NoMental changeYes (+1)
NoAge < 60 yearsYes (+1)
NoPressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg)Yes (+1)
YesStroke risk (DM, cardiac)No (+1)
Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVONon-ELVO preferredItems (CIVIL-GFAST)ELVO preferred
□ Clinical InfomationNoGaze deviationYes (+1)
NoFace asymmetryYes (+1)
NoArm asymmetryYes (+1)
NoSpeech disturbanceYes (+1)


Table 3. Previous stroke scoring system
CountryStroke scoring systemContents
USACincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS)A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification
UKRecognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER)Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes
USALos Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes

  1. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Chugh S, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet Neurology 2016;15(9):913-24.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale: reproducibility and validity. Annals of emergency medicine 1999;33(4):373-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL. Identifying stroke in the field: prospective validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000;31(1):71-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Nor AM, Davis J, Sen B, Shipsey D, Louw SJ, Dyker AG, et al. The Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument. The Lancet Neurology 2005;4(11):727-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Lee SE, Choi MH, Kang HJ, Lee S-J, Lee JS, Lee Y, et al. Stepwise stroke recognition through clinical information, vital signs, and initial labs (CIVIL): Electronic health record-based observational cohort study. PloS one 2020;15(4):e0231113.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Original Articles

Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(49): 3495-3501

Published online December 2, 2021

Copyright © The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Stepwise stroke recognition through Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) : electronic health record-based observational cohort study

Sung Eun Lee1, Min Kim2, Ji Man Hong2, Seung Hee Lee3, Sang-Moon Yun3, Won-Ho Kim3

1Department of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
3Division of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Department of Chronic Disease Convergence Research, National Institute of Health (NIH), Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)

Abstract

Stroke recognition systems have been developed to reduce time delays, however, a comprehensive triaging score identifying stroke subtypes is needed to guide appropriate management. This study aimed to develop a prehospital scoring system for rapid stroke recognition and identify stroke subtype simultaneously.
In the prospective database of the regional emergency and stroke center, the Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) of 1,599 patients suspected of acute stroke was analyzed from an automatically-stored electronic health record. Final confirmation was performed with neuroimaging. Using multiple regression analyses, this study determined independent predictors of tier 1 (true-stroke or not), tier 2 (hemorrhagic stroke or not), and tier 3 (emergent large vessel occlusion [ELVO] or not). The diagnostic performance of the stepwise CIVIL scoring system was investigated using internal validation. A new scoring system characterized by a stepwise clinical assessment was developed in three tiers.
Tier 1: Seven CIVIL-AS3A2P items (total score from –7 to +6) were deduced for true stroke as age (>60 years); stroke risks without seizure or psychiatric disease, extreme sugar; “any asymmetry”, “not ambulating”; abnormal blood pressure at a cut-off point +1 with diagnostic sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 56.4%. Tier 2: Four items for hemorrhagic stroke were identified as the CIVIL-MAPS indicating mental change, Age below 60 years, high blood Pressure, no Stroke risks with cut-point +2 (sensitivity 47.5%, specificity 85.4%). Tier 3: For ELVO diagnosis: we applied with CIVIL-GFAST items (Gaze, Face, Arm, Speech) with cut-point >3 (sensitivity 66.5%, specificity 79.8%) were applied.
The CIVIL score is a comprehensive and versatile system that recognizes strokes and identifies the stroke subtype simultaneously.

Keywords: Stroke, Stroke mimic, Hemorrhagic stroke, Ischemic stroke, Emergent large vessel occlusion

Body

Identifying of suspicious acute stroke patients in a stepwise fashion
TierCIVIL scoring system
1Stroke mimic vs true stroke
2Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke
3Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO


Descriptive comparison of various early stroke recognition scales
Tier 1 : mimic vs strokeMimic preferredItems (CIVIL-AS3A2P)Stroke preferred

□ Clinical Infomation.

■ Vital signs.

■ Initial Labs.

40 years (-1)Age≥ 60 years (+1)
No (-1)Stroke risk (cardiac)Yes (+1)
Yes (-1)Seizure or psychiatric historyNo (+1)
≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1)Sugar-
No (-1)AsymmetryYes (+1)
No (-1)not AmbulatingYes (+1)
≤ 90 mmHg (-1)Pressure (SBP)≥ 140 mmHg (+1)
Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagicIschemic preferredItems (CIVIL-MAPS)Hemorrhagic preferred

□ Clinical Infomation.

■ Vital signs.

NoMental changeYes (+1)
NoAge < 60 yearsYes (+1)
NoPressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg)Yes (+1)
YesStroke risk (DM, cardiac)No (+1)
Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVONon-ELVO preferredItems (CIVIL-GFAST)ELVO preferred
□ Clinical InfomationNoGaze deviationYes (+1)
NoFace asymmetryYes (+1)
NoArm asymmetryYes (+1)
NoSpeech disturbanceYes (+1)


Previous stroke scoring system
CountryStroke scoring systemContents
USACincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS)A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification
UKRecognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER)Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes
USALos Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes

Identifying of suspicious acute stroke patients in a stepwise fashion
TierCIVIL scoring system
1Stroke mimic vs true stroke
2Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke
3Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO

Descriptive comparison of various early stroke recognition scales
Tier 1 : mimic vs strokeMimic preferredItems (CIVIL-AS3A2P)Stroke preferred

□ Clinical Infomation.

■ Vital signs.

■ Initial Labs.

40 years (-1)Age≥ 60 years (+1)
No (-1)Stroke risk (cardiac)Yes (+1)
Yes (-1)Seizure or psychiatric historyNo (+1)
≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1)Sugar-
No (-1)AsymmetryYes (+1)
No (-1)not AmbulatingYes (+1)
≤ 90 mmHg (-1)Pressure (SBP)≥ 140 mmHg (+1)
Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagicIschemic preferredItems (CIVIL-MAPS)Hemorrhagic preferred

□ Clinical Infomation.

■ Vital signs.

NoMental changeYes (+1)
NoAge < 60 yearsYes (+1)
NoPressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg)Yes (+1)
YesStroke risk (DM, cardiac)No (+1)
Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVONon-ELVO preferredItems (CIVIL-GFAST)ELVO preferred
□ Clinical InfomationNoGaze deviationYes (+1)
NoFace asymmetryYes (+1)
NoArm asymmetryYes (+1)
NoSpeech disturbanceYes (+1)

Previous stroke scoring system
CountryStroke scoring systemContents
USACincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS)A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification
UKRecognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER)Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes
USALos Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes

References

  1. Feigin VL, Roth GA, Naghavi M, Parmar P, Krishnamurthi R, Chugh S, et al. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet Neurology 2016;15(9):913-24.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, Brott T, Broderick J. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale: reproducibility and validity. Annals of emergency medicine 1999;33(4):373-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Weems K, Saver JL. Identifying stroke in the field: prospective validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000;31(1):71-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Nor AM, Davis J, Sen B, Shipsey D, Louw SJ, Dyker AG, et al. The Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument. The Lancet Neurology 2005;4(11):727-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Lee SE, Choi MH, Kang HJ, Lee S-J, Lee JS, Lee Y, et al. Stepwise stroke recognition through clinical information, vital signs, and initial labs (CIVIL): Electronic health record-based observational cohort study. PloS one 2020;15(4):e0231113.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Share

  • line

Related articles

PHWR