Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(49): 3495-3501
Published online December 2, 2021
© The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency
Sung Eun Lee1, Min Kim2, Ji Man Hong2, Seung Hee Lee3, Sang-Moon Yun3, Won-Ho Kim3
1Department of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
3Division of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Department of Chronic Disease Convergence Research, National Institute of Health (NIH), Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)
Stroke recognition systems have been developed to reduce time delays, however, a comprehensive triaging score identifying stroke subtypes is needed to guide appropriate management. This study aimed to develop a prehospital scoring system for rapid stroke recognition and identify stroke subtype simultaneously.
In the prospective database of the regional emergency and stroke center, the Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) of 1,599 patients suspected of acute stroke was analyzed from an automatically-stored electronic health record. Final confirmation was performed with neuroimaging. Using multiple regression analyses, this study determined independent predictors of tier 1 (true-stroke or not), tier 2 (hemorrhagic stroke or not), and tier 3 (emergent large vessel occlusion [ELVO] or not). The diagnostic performance of the stepwise CIVIL scoring system was investigated using internal validation. A new scoring system characterized by a stepwise clinical assessment was developed in three tiers.
Tier 1: Seven CIVIL-AS3A2P items (total score from –7 to +6) were deduced for true stroke as age (>60 years); stroke risks without seizure or psychiatric disease, extreme sugar; “any asymmetry”, “not ambulating”; abnormal blood pressure at a cut-off point +1 with diagnostic sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 56.4%. Tier 2: Four items for hemorrhagic stroke were identified as the CIVIL-MAPS indicating mental change, Age below 60 years, high blood Pressure, no Stroke risks with cut-point +2 (sensitivity 47.5%, specificity 85.4%). Tier 3: For ELVO diagnosis: we applied with CIVIL-GFAST items (Gaze, Face, Arm, Speech) with cut-point >3 (sensitivity 66.5%, specificity 79.8%) were applied.
The CIVIL score is a comprehensive and versatile system that recognizes strokes and identifies the stroke subtype simultaneously.
Key words Stroke, Stroke mimic, Hemorrhagic stroke, Ischemic stroke, Emergent large vessel occlusion
| Tier | CIVIL scoring system |
|---|---|
| 1 | Stroke mimic vs true stroke |
| 2 | Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke |
| 3 | Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO |
| Tier 1 : mimic vs stroke | Mimic preferred | Items (CIVIL-AS3A2P) | Stroke preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation ■ Vital signs ■ Initial Labs | 40 years (-1) | Age | ≥ 60 years (+1) |
| No (-1) | Stroke risk (cardiac) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes (-1) | Seizure or psychiatric history | No (+1) | |
| ≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1) | Sugar | - | |
| No (-1) | Asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No (-1) | not Ambulating | Yes (+1) | |
| ≤ 90 mmHg (-1) | Pressure (SBP) | ≥ 140 mmHg (+1) |
| Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagic | Ischemic preferred | Items (CIVIL-MAPS) | Hemorrhagic preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation ■ Vital signs | No | Mental change | Yes (+1) |
| No | Age < 60 years | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Pressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes | Stroke risk (DM, cardiac) | No (+1) |
| Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVO | Non-ELVO preferred | Items (CIVIL-GFAST) | ELVO preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| □ Clinical Infomation | No | Gaze deviation | Yes (+1) |
| No | Face asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Arm asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Speech disturbance | Yes (+1) |
| Country | Stroke scoring system | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) | A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification |
| UK | Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) | Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes |
| USA | Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) | A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes |
Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(49): 3495-3501
Published online December 2, 2021
Copyright © The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.
Sung Eun Lee1, Min Kim2, Ji Man Hong2, Seung Hee Lee3, Sang-Moon Yun3, Won-Ho Kim3
1Department of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
3Division of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Department of Chronic Disease Convergence Research, National Institute of Health (NIH), Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA)
Stroke recognition systems have been developed to reduce time delays, however, a comprehensive triaging score identifying stroke subtypes is needed to guide appropriate management. This study aimed to develop a prehospital scoring system for rapid stroke recognition and identify stroke subtype simultaneously.
In the prospective database of the regional emergency and stroke center, the Clinical Information, Vital signs, and Initial Labs (CIVIL) of 1,599 patients suspected of acute stroke was analyzed from an automatically-stored electronic health record. Final confirmation was performed with neuroimaging. Using multiple regression analyses, this study determined independent predictors of tier 1 (true-stroke or not), tier 2 (hemorrhagic stroke or not), and tier 3 (emergent large vessel occlusion [ELVO] or not). The diagnostic performance of the stepwise CIVIL scoring system was investigated using internal validation. A new scoring system characterized by a stepwise clinical assessment was developed in three tiers.
Tier 1: Seven CIVIL-AS3A2P items (total score from –7 to +6) were deduced for true stroke as age (>60 years); stroke risks without seizure or psychiatric disease, extreme sugar; “any asymmetry”, “not ambulating”; abnormal blood pressure at a cut-off point +1 with diagnostic sensitivity of 82.1%, specificity of 56.4%. Tier 2: Four items for hemorrhagic stroke were identified as the CIVIL-MAPS indicating mental change, Age below 60 years, high blood Pressure, no Stroke risks with cut-point +2 (sensitivity 47.5%, specificity 85.4%). Tier 3: For ELVO diagnosis: we applied with CIVIL-GFAST items (Gaze, Face, Arm, Speech) with cut-point >3 (sensitivity 66.5%, specificity 79.8%) were applied.
The CIVIL score is a comprehensive and versatile system that recognizes strokes and identifies the stroke subtype simultaneously.
Keywords: Stroke, Stroke mimic, Hemorrhagic stroke, Ischemic stroke, Emergent large vessel occlusion
| Tier | CIVIL scoring system |
|---|---|
| 1 | Stroke mimic vs true stroke |
| 2 | Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke |
| 3 | Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO |
| Tier 1 : mimic vs stroke | Mimic preferred | Items (CIVIL-AS3A2P) | Stroke preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation. ■ Vital signs. ■ Initial Labs. | 40 years (-1) | Age | ≥ 60 years (+1) |
| No (-1) | Stroke risk (cardiac) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes (-1) | Seizure or psychiatric history | No (+1) | |
| ≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1) | Sugar | - | |
| No (-1) | Asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No (-1) | not Ambulating | Yes (+1) | |
| ≤ 90 mmHg (-1) | Pressure (SBP) | ≥ 140 mmHg (+1) |
| Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagic | Ischemic preferred | Items (CIVIL-MAPS) | Hemorrhagic preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation. ■ Vital signs. | No | Mental change | Yes (+1) |
| No | Age < 60 years | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Pressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes | Stroke risk (DM, cardiac) | No (+1) |
| Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVO | Non-ELVO preferred | Items (CIVIL-GFAST) | ELVO preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| □ Clinical Infomation | No | Gaze deviation | Yes (+1) |
| No | Face asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Arm asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Speech disturbance | Yes (+1) |
| Country | Stroke scoring system | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) | A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification |
| UK | Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) | Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes |
| USA | Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) | A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes |
| Tier | CIVIL scoring system |
|---|---|
| 1 | Stroke mimic vs true stroke |
| 2 | Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke |
| 3 | Emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) vs Non-ELVO |
| Tier 1 : mimic vs stroke | Mimic preferred | Items (CIVIL-AS3A2P) | Stroke preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation. ■ Vital signs. ■ Initial Labs. | 40 years (-1) | Age | ≥ 60 years (+1) |
| No (-1) | Stroke risk (cardiac) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes (-1) | Seizure or psychiatric history | No (+1) | |
| ≤ 80 or ≥ 400mg/dl (-1) | Sugar | - | |
| No (-1) | Asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No (-1) | not Ambulating | Yes (+1) | |
| ≤ 90 mmHg (-1) | Pressure (SBP) | ≥ 140 mmHg (+1) |
| Tier 2 : Ischemic vs hemorrhagic | Ischemic preferred | Items (CIVIL-MAPS) | Hemorrhagic preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
□ Clinical Infomation. ■ Vital signs. | No | Mental change | Yes (+1) |
| No | Age < 60 years | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Pressure (SBP ≥ 160mmHg) | Yes (+1) | |
| Yes | Stroke risk (DM, cardiac) | No (+1) |
| Tier 3 : non-ELVO vs ELVO | Non-ELVO preferred | Items (CIVIL-GFAST) | ELVO preferred |
|---|---|---|---|
| □ Clinical Infomation | No | Gaze deviation | Yes (+1) |
| No | Face asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Arm asymmetry | Yes (+1) | |
| No | Speech disturbance | Yes (+1) |
| Country | Stroke scoring system | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) | A system for diagnosing stroke at pre-hospital (facial droop, arm drift, speech): simple and convenient to use, but without classification |
| UK | Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) | Early screening system for acute stroke in suspected stroke patients : Relatively complex and undetectable of stroke subtypes |
| USA | Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) | A system to screen for stroke in pre-hospital : It is actually used in 119, but undetectable of stroke subtypes |
Dae Hyun Kim, Deog Young Kim, Jongmin Lee, Min Kyun Sohn, Min-Keun Song, Yong-Il Shin, Yang-Soo Lee, Min Cheol Joo, So Young Lee, Jeonghoon Ahn, Gyung-Jae Oh, Young Hoon Lee, Junhee Han, Ho Seok Lee, Doona Cho, Young-Taek Kim, Yun-Hee Kim, Won Hyuk Chang
Public Health Weekly Report 2024; 17(42): 1767-1785 https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2024.17.42.1Mi-sun Oh, Minwoo Lee and Kyung-Ho Yu, Sang-Moon Yun, Won-Ho Kim
Public Health Weekly Report 2021; 14(40): 2822-2830 https://doi.org/10.56786/phwr.2021.14.40.2822Yun-Hee Kim, Won Hyuk Chang, Seyoung Shin, Doo-na Cho, Deog Young Kim, Yong Wook Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Ji-hyun Park, Jongmin Lee, Hyun-Haeng Lee, Min Kyun Sohn, Sung-Ju Jee, Sam-Gyu Lee, Min-Keun Song, Yong-il Shin, Sung-Hwa Ko, Ji-Hong Min, Yang-Soo Lee, Yu-Sun Min, Ae-Ryoung Kim, Min Cheol Joo, Ji-hee Kim, Gyung-Jae Oh, Young-Hoon Lee, So Young Lee, Jun Hee Han, Jeonghoon Ahn, Soo Mi Choi, Jeesoo Seo, Seon Kui Lee
Public Health Weekly Report 2022; 15(7): 435-449 https://doi.org/10.56786/phwr.2022.15.7.435